Karnoski v. Trump
Case Challenging Trump's Directive Banning Military Service for Transgender AmericansKey Date: July 18, 2018
Status: Headed to Trial in 2018
Legal Team: Lambda Legal
Type: Other LGBT Litigation
In July 2017 President Donald Trump tweeted a proposal to prohibit transgender Americans from serving in the United States military “in any capacity.” The proposal undercuts an entire year where transgender Americans served openly in the military, following an in-depth study from the U.S. Department of Defense. Thousands of transgender people are currently serving in the U.S. military.
On August 28 Karnoski v. Trump was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington challenging Trump’s attempt to reinstate a ban on open service for transgender people. It is filed on behalf of two transgender people who wish to join the military, an active servicemember seeking appointment as an officer, the Human Rights Campaign (which represents LGBTQ Americans), and Gender Justice League, an organization committed to fighting for the human rights of LGBTQ people.
The case is being led by Lambda Legal in conjunction with OutServe-SLDN and the Human Rights Campagin.
Latest in the Case:
On April 13, 2018 U.S. District Court Judge Marsha J. Pechman sent the case to trial, while a preliminary injunction blocking the ban remains in place. Pechman determined that the ban will have to survive “strict scrutiny,” meaning that before Defendants can implement the military ban, they must show that it was sincerely motivated by compelling interests, rather than by prejudice or stereotype, and that it is narrowly tailored to achieve those interests. This is the first time a federal court has held that transgender people are entitled to strict scrutiny.
On July 18, 2018 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied another attempt by the Trump Administration to implement a ban on transgender people serving openly in the military. The Department of Justice could now ask the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the case.
- August 25, 2017: President Trump signs a directive banning transgender Americans from enlisting in the United States military and leaving thousands of currently serving transgender servicemembers in limbo.
- August 28, 2017: Lambda Legal file the initial complaint in the case, challenging President Trump’s proposed ban on open service for transgender Americans.
- November 21, 2017: U.S. District Court Judge Marsha J. Pechman heard oral argument on Lambda Legal’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Washington.
- December 11, 2017: Judge Pechman grants Lambda Legal’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, halting the implementation of the ban.
- December 14, 2017: Defendants appeal Preliminary Injunction ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.
- January 25, 2018: Plaintiffs file Motion for Summary Judgment seeking to permanently block the anti-transgender order.
- March 27, 2018: Judge Pechman hears oral argument in the case.
- April 13, 2018: Judge Pechman issues an order denying Plaintiffs’ and State of Washington’s motions for summary judgment, sending the case to trial while the preliminary injunction remains in place. Equality Case Files writes, “Judge Pechman determined that the ban will have to survive “strict scrutiny,” meaning that before Defendants can implement the military ban, they must show that it was sincerely motivated by compelling interests, rather than by prejudice or stereotype, and that it is narrowly tailored to achieve those interests. This is the first time a federal court has held that transgender people are entitled to strict scrutiny.”
- June 15, 2018: Judge Pechman denies a motion from the Trump Administration to stay the preliminary injunction, writing, “The status quo shall remain ‘steady as she goes,’ and the preliminary injunction shall remain in full force and effect nationwide.”
- July 18, 2018: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denies another attempt by the Trump Administration to implement a ban on transgender people serving openly in the military.
Last Updated July 29, 2018Lambda Legal Case Page